The Robotic Chess Companion - Hammacher Schlemmer. Not too many years ago, a chess playing robot was impossible. Robotics, and sophisticated computer technology, have made chess playing computers possible. Repetitive human tasks are being performed by robots in factories. In Paul Morphy's time, the fiction of a chess playing robot was a fantasy. In today's time, I actually purchased this robot for $150 and it actually follows commands of a chess computer inside, and picks up the pieces and moves them to the correct square. When it captures a piece, it picks up the captured piece, puts it down, and then moves its own piece to the captured square on the board. I am going to put little eyes on a sock and make this guy into a fake human opponent. While playing against the computer the other day, it occurred to me that, armed with knowledge, this computer could make human like decisions. But, could an expert system be placed into a robot, and, dressed in a suit, walk into a courtroom armed with the Civil Rules of Procedure, and all of the statutes and case law, and represent a client? Of course not, you say. Being a lawyer requires a certain amount of art and human qualities. Robots don't possess the judgment and can't dispense with the rules when that judgment dictates. They can't exercise discretion. Or can they? Is it that we just don't want our fates decided by a species different than ourselves? Are humans, breaking the rules when they choose, not just another form of tyranny? Just thinking out loud.