Chat GPT Is Not Good At Legal Research...So Let's Use It To Teach LegaL Research. This is a great article by David S. Kemp, the Managing Editor of Verdict, and a former Law Professor. As a former Law Professor myself, I can attest to the fact that Law Professors spend the bulk of their time briefing and discussing appellate case law in their classes. Of course, that also entails a discussion of the statutes, regulations and other materials that serve as the incubators for the disputes resolved in case law. But, the actual learning of how to find applicable case or statutory law is a subject usually relegated to a couple of first year courses, and is really learned in the trenches. In my day, pulling case books off the shelf, poring through indexes and treatises, and then, later in my early career, learning how to search cases collected on CDRoms, and later the Internet and computers. Chat GPT and the other current resources are really tools to analyze a complete database of legal materials, and they aren't actually current. (Chat GPT is up to around April, 2023). And, due to the construction of the algorithms, the bots tend to make up citations occasionally, or, as is more common, they refer the user to an actual database of cases, or a lawyer. But, if not useful as a case finder, they are really good at distilling a body of legal knowledge into a cogent analysis of a particular legal problem, which is the first thing law students need to learn how to do. So, I am not afraid of the future of generative AI. I look at it as making lawyer's abilities enhanced. With these computer tools, we can all become legal researchers on figurative steroids. Meet the super lawyer, who can leap complex legal issues with a single prompt. Now, get out there and lawyer on.